Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Are all outside directors created equal? Do they differ in their governance roles? Evidence from voluntary disclosures of biotechnology firms
There are no files associated with this item.
|Title:||Are all outside directors created equal? Do they differ in their governance roles? Evidence from voluntary disclosures of biotechnology firms|
|Issue Date:||30 Aug 2017|
|Abstract:||Empirical evidence on the association between outside directors and firms’ voluntary disclosures is mixed and controversial. We hypothesize that the outside directors do not represent a homogeneous group of people as previously considered in the literature. An outside director’s professional expertise and experience could shape her assessment of costs and benefits of disclosures as well as the investors’ demands for disclosures. Using hand-collected data from a sample of biotechnology firms, we find that the aforesaid association differs based on directors’ professional backgrounds. Thus, the outside directors must be distinguished from each other based on their professional backgrounds vis-à-vis their corporate governance roles. Our study has policy implications|
|Description:||Inquiries about this document can be made to HARC@hawaii.edu|
|Appears in Collections:||09 Financial: Manager Ability / Financial Analysts / Disclosure (FAR1)|
Please contact email@example.com if you need this content in an alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.