Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/51382

Should Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Work in Tandem?

File Description SizeFormat 
2016-05-phd-kimjaehyeon_r.pdfVersion for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted629.83 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
2016-05-phd-kimjaehyeon_uh.pdfFor UH users only794.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Should Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Work in Tandem?
Authors: Kim, Jaehyeon
Keywords: Corporate Governance
Corporate Social Responsibility
Firm Value
Credit Ratings
Issue Date: May 2016
Publisher: [Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [May 2016]
Abstract: In addition to financial returns, investors and creditors are increasingly focused on corporate governance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices of their portfolio firms. Economic theories, such as agency theory and enlightened stakeholder theory explain the effects of corporate governance or CSR on corporate outcomes (Jensen and Meckling, 1976; Jensen, 2010). However, these economic theories do not adequately address the effects on corporate outcomes of interrelationships between corporate governance and CSR in a sophisticated manner. Koonce and Mercer (2005) note that psychology theories enable researchers to examine the behaviors of managers, auditors, investors and analysts in a concrete way. They further note that archival accounting researchers neglect psychology theories—despite their usefulness—for their research. Building on sensemaking theory from psychology (Starbuck and Milliken, 1988; Weick, 1995) and analyzing US firms from 1993 to 2006, I show that incongruent practices between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility causes investors and credit agencies to have equivocality about firms, leading to their negative identification of the firms which, in turn, decreases firm value and credit ratings. I show that having a balance between corporate governance and CSR is important for firm value and credit ratings. This dissertation makes contributions in terms of firm policy implications, in that management and board members of US firms often pay attention to shareholder value maximization, but disregard stakeholder concerns. This dissertation also helps correct misconceptions of some investors who focus too much on short-termism—believing that firms’ engaging in CSR destroys firm value—by providing evidence that encouraging firms to pursue balanced corporate governance and CSR benefits investors and creditors, as well as society.
Description: Ph.D. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2016.
Includes bibliographical references.
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/51382
Appears in Collections:Ph.D. - Business Administration



Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.