Show simple item record



Item Description

dc.contributor.author Glenn, Akiemi en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2009-04-02T18:11:30Z en_US
dc.date.available 2009-04-02T18:11:30Z en_US
dc.date.issued 2009-03-14 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/5035 en_US
dc.description Documentary linguistics is engaged in an evolving discourse on best practices, methods, and ethics in an effort to establish a theory of language documentation. A developing consensus in the literature is that a language documentation should be comprehensive, data-centered, and usable by diverse audiences of academics, speech community members, and others. Writers have argued that comprehensiveness requires an orientation to many issues that are beyond the standard training and expertise of most linguists and that any successful documentation project will draw on the multiple strengths of interdisciplinary collaboration as well as collaboration with the speech community under study. As a result, “collaboration” has surfaced as a key term in best practices literature in language documentation and is used to describe both interactions between scholars and between researchers and communities. At the moment, collaboration is not the norm broadly in linguistics and for linguists coming to a documentation project the methods of effective collaboration may be difficult to identify. A theory of language documentation must also grapple with its theoretical orientation to collaboration. While the nature of collaboration between researchers and communities is best determined by the situation and individual cultures involved, there should be a theoretical space within the discipline of language documentation to begin to explore best practices for researchers working together. The first aim of this paper is to provide a review of some key literature on the subject of collaboration between researchers in the physical and computer sciences and the humanities. Secondly, the goal is to identify five aspects of academic collaboration—coordination, distribution of labor, standards for interoperation, authorship and authority, and feedback—that have special bearing on the enterprise of language documentation. Finally, the paper investigates these dimensions of collaboration as a starting point for linguists and our collaborators to consider critically what collaboration means for a language documentation project and for the discipline of linguistics. Through reviewing the five dimensions, I will suggest that a true theory of coordination of our efforts and interoperatability of the products of our documentation will require linguists to reorient our assumptions about the value of 'lone-wolf' linguistics, the power of the relationships between researchers, and will emphasize the advantage in engaging and perhaps altering the social and cultural underpinnings of linguistics as a discipline. en_US
dc.language.iso en-US en_US
dc.rights Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported en_US
dc.title Five dimensions of collaboration: Toward a critical theory of coordination and interoperatability in language documentation en_US
dc.contributor.speaker Glenn, Akiemi en_US
dc.date.begin 2009-03-12 en_US
dc.date.finish 2009-03-14 en_US

Item File(s)

Files Size Format View
5035.JPG 2.502Mb JPEG image Thumbnail
5035.mp3 27.67Mb mp3 audio View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

About