Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/49937

Team Faultline Measures: The Effect of Rescaling Weights

File SizeFormat 
paper0050.pdf785.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Team Faultline Measures: The Effect of Rescaling Weights
Authors: Bahmani, Keivan
Semnani-Azad, Zhaleh
Sycara, Katia
Lewis, Michael
Keywords: Negotiation, Leadership, and Technology
Diversity, Faultlines Measures, Rescaling Weights
Issue Date: 03 Jan 2018
Abstract: Faultline, or subgroup formation based on the alignment of diversity attributes, can cause conflicts and low coordination in diverse teams. While researchers understand the importance of faultlines in team process and negotiations, current computational faultline measures are highly vulnerable to subjective weight assignment of diversity attributes. Therefore, there is limited understanding of which diversity attributes have more impact on faultline formation. In this paper we report 1) a pilot study illustrating the susceptibility of the current faultline measures to subjective evaluations, and 2) an online study illustrating how people’s surface (e.g. age, gender, race) and deep (e.g. personality, cultural norms) level diversity attributes impact their preference and selection of team members, as a proxy of faultline formation. We find while various surface and deep-level attributes predict selection of members, most of these attributes are highly correlated with members’ age, suggesting the importance of this attribute. We discuss future directions for faultline measures with objective rescaling of diversity weights.
Pages/Duration: 9 pages
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/49937
ISBN: 978-0-9981331-1-9
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Negotiation, Leadership, and Technology


Please contact sspace@hawaii.edu if you need this content in an alternative format.

Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.