Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/46047

The International Court of Justice in the Settlemend of International Investment Disputes

File SizeFormat 
SSRN-id2195780.pdf480.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: The International Court of Justice in the Settlemend of International Investment Disputes
Authors: Desierto, Diane A
Keywords: International Court of Justice
Article 64 ICSID Convention
parallel domestic actions
provisional measures
post-award conservatory measures
Issue Date: 2012
Publisher: Journal of Dispute Prevention and Resolution
Citation: Desierto, D. The International Court of Justice in the Settlemend of Internation Investment Disputes. Journal of Dispute Prevention and Resultion, Vol. 1, No.2, 2012.
Related To: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2195780
Abstract: This article examines the contemporary role of the International Court of Justice in the settlement of international investment disputes, specifically through the currently unused mechanism of Article 64 of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States (hereafter, the “ICSID Convention”). Part II (Court of Last Resort, but not Appeal: the Article 64 Clause Compromissoire in the ICSID Convention) examines how Article 64 of the ICSID Convention operates as a clause compromissoire to invoke the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court: “[a]ny dispute arising between Contracting States concerning the interpretation or application of this Convention which is not settled by negotiation shall be referred to the International Court of Justice by the application of any party to such dispute, unless the States concerned agree to another method of dispute settlement”. Read in conjunction with Article 27(1) of the ICSID Convention (a provision that expressly prohibits States from diplomatically espousing claims that are already subject of a pending arbitration), Article 64 has been regarded as a postaward inter-State enforcement mechanism to ensure compliance with arbitral awards issued under the Convention. On the basis of this conception, the Court has not yet received any referrals of international investment disputes since the passage of the ICSID Convention.
Pages/Duration: 46 pages
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/46047
Appears in Collections:Desierto, Diane



Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.