Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4456

Chapter 9. Be careful what you throw out: Gemination and tonal feet in Weledeh Dogrib

File Description SizeFormat 
09jaker.pdfRestricted for viewing only686.06 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Chapter 9. Be careful what you throw out: Gemination and tonal feet in Weledeh Dogrib
Authors: Jaker, Alessandro
Keywords: Weledeh Dogrib
Yellowknives Dene First Nation
Northwest Territories
lexical phonology
consonant length
Issue Date: May 2010
Publisher: University of Hawai'i Press
Citation: Jaker, Alessandro. 2010. Be careful what you throw out: Gemination and tonal feet in Weledeh Dogrib. In Andrea L. Berez, Jean Mulder, & Daisy Rosenblum (eds.), Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas, 203-222. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.
Series/Report no.: LD&C Special Publication 2
Abstract: The Weledeh dialect of Dogrib (Tłįchǫ Yatiì) is spoken by people of the Yellowknives Dene First Nation, in and around Yellowknife, Northwest Territories. Within the formal framework of Lexical Phonology (Kiparsky 1982), this paper argues for an over-arching generalization in the phonology of Weledeh Dogrib: the constraint NoContour-Ft, which prefers (High-High) and (Low-Low) feet, but militates against (High-Low) and (Low-High) feet. NoContour-Ft is satisfied differently in different morphophonological domains: vowel deletion at the Stem Level, gemination at the Word Level, and High to Mid tone lowering at the Postlexical Level. This analysis requires that consonant length be treated as phonological in Dogrib—that is, consonant length contributes to syllable weight and mora count—even though there are no minimal pairs based on consonant length. Similarly, the distinction between High and Middle tone does not distinguish any lexical items, but is nevertheless important for the prosody of the language. Thus the paper makes a methodological point about the importance of allophonic alternations for phonological theory. Our view of what counts as contrastive or allophonic, however, is to a large extent theory-dependent; therefore, the paper also emphasizes the importance of phonetic measurements when doing fieldwork.
Sponsor: National Foreign Language Resource Center
Pages/Duration: 20 pages
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4456
ISBN: 978-0-8248-3530-9
Rights: Creative Commons Non-Attribution Share Alike License
Appears in Collections:LD&C Special Publication No. 2: Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons