Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/4450

Chapter 3. Classifying clitics in Sm'algyax: Approaching theory from the field

File SizeFormat 
03muldersellers.pdf500.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Full Item Record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMulder, Jeanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSellers, Hollyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-19T01:06:45Z-
dc.date.available2010-05-19T01:06:45Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05en_US
dc.identifier.citationMulder, Jean & Holly Sellers. 2010. Classifying clitics in Sm'algyax: Approaching theory from the field. In Andrea L. Berez, Jean Mulder, & Daisy Rosenblum (eds.), Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas, 33-56. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-8248-3530-9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10125/4450-
dc.description.abstractSm’algyax (British Columbia and Alaska) is a highly ergative VAO/VS language with an uncommonly wide range of clitics. This chapter has the two-fold function of demonstrating how Anderson’s (2005) constraint-based analysis of clitics gives insight into the complex behavior of Sm’algyax clitics, and how the clitics themselves afford empirical means of testing such a theory. The Sm’algyax data are drawn from both field research and published texts, reflecting a community-based approach to language documentation that has evolved through a long-term, collaborative relationship with the Tsimshian (Sm’algyax) communities. Building on Stebbin’s (2003) definitions of intermediate word classes in Sm’algyax and Anderson’s Optimality Theoretical approach, we determine that in terms of their varying phonological dependence, Sm’algyax clitics include internal, phonological word, and affixal clitics. The existence of affixal clitics in Sm’algyax, however, calls into question the viability of the Strict Layer Hypothesis (Selkirk 1984) as inviolable rules when describing clitics. Furthermore, Sm’algyax provides strong evidence that the direction of clitic attachment is more clitic specific than language specific. In characterising the behaviour of Sm’algyax clitics, we find that not only does linguistic theory help sharpen our understanding of the fieldwork data, but also that field linguistics has consequences for linguistic theory.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Foreign Language Resource Centeren_US
dc.format.extent24 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Hawai'i Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLD&C Special Publication 2en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives Licenceen_US
dc.subjectcliticsen_US
dc.subjectSm'algyaxen_US
dc.subjectBritish Columbiaen_US
dc.subjectAlaskaen_US
dc.subjectTsimshianen_US
dc.titleChapter 3. Classifying clitics in Sm'algyax: Approaching theory from the fielden_US
dc.typeBook Chapteren_US
dc.type.dcmiTexten_US
Appears in Collections:LD&C Special Publication No. 2: Fieldwork and Linguistic Analysis in Indigenous Languages of the Americas



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons