Cognition hypothesis and second language performance: Comparison of written and oral task performance

Date
2011
Authors
Sasayama, Shoko
Contributor
Advisor
Brown, James D.
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
This study sought to test Robinson's (1995, 2003b) cognition hypothesis by investigating the effect of cognitive task difficulty on ESL learners' written and oral task performance. Ten exchange students at the University of Hawai'I at Manoa were given four sets of picture-based narrative tasks: a simple writing task, a difficult writing task, a simple speaking task, and a difficult speaking task. The simple tasks contained a fewer characters or main foreground events, but not supporting background events, in cartoon-based stories; on the other hand, the complex tasks included more characters or both foregorund and background events. The results indicated that (a) the difficuly task was more successful than was the difficult speaking task in eliciting complex language production without deteriorating its accuracy; (b) the cognition hypothesis seems to be more relevant to language complexity than accuracy, and (c) accuracy of language production seems to be more susceptible to individual learners' ability to produce accurate sentences than cognitive taks difficulty. These findings, therefore, partially support and partially disconfirm Robinson's cognition hypothesis.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Extent
24 pages
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
University of Hawai'I Second Langauge Studies Paper 29(2)
Table of Contents
Rights
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.