Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Cognition hypothesis and second language performance: Comparison of written and oral task performance
|Title:||Cognition hypothesis and second language performance: Comparison of written and oral task performance|
|Advisor:||Brown, James D.|
|Abstract:||This study sought to test Robinson's (1995, 2003b) cognition hypothesis by investigating the effect of cognitive task difficulty on ESL learners' written and oral task performance. Ten exchange students at the University of Hawai'I at Manoa were given four sets of picture-based narrative tasks: a simple writing task, a difficult writing task, a simple speaking task, and a difficult speaking task. The simple tasks contained a fewer characters or main foreground events, but not supporting background events, in cartoon-based stories; on the other hand, the complex tasks included more characters or both foregorund and background events. The results indicated that (a) the difficuly task was more successful than was the difficult speaking task in eliciting complex language production without deteriorating its accuracy; (b) the cognition hypothesis seems to be more relevant to language complexity than accuracy, and (c) accuracy of language production seems to be more susceptible to individual learners' ability to produce accurate sentences than cognitive taks difficulty. These findings, therefore, partially support and partially disconfirm Robinson's cognition hypothesis.|
|Appears in Collections:||SLS Papers|
Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org if you need this content in an alternative format.
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.