Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/39599

Using Qualitative Methods to Improve Questionnaires for Spanish Speakers: Assessing Face Validity of a Food Behavior Checklist

File SizeFormat 
nihms741180.pdf2.2 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Using Qualitative Methods to Improve Questionnaires for Spanish Speakers: Assessing Face Validity of a Food Behavior Checklist
Authors: Banna, Jinan C.
Becerra, Luz E. Vera
Kaiser, Lucia L.
Townsend, Marilyn S.
Issue Date: Dec 2015
Publisher: Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Citation: BANNA JC, VERA BECERRA LE, KAISER LL, TOWNSEND MS. Using Qualitative Methods to Improve Questionnaires for Spanish Speakers: Assessing Face Validity of a Food Behavior Checklist. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 2010;110(1):80-90. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.002.
Related To: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002822309016782
Abstract: Development of outcome measures relevant to health nutrition behaviors requires a rigorous process of testing and revision. Whereas researchers often report performance of quantitative data collection to assess questionnaire validity and reliability, qualitative testing procedures are often overlooked. This report outlines a procedure for assessing face validity of a Spanish-language dietary assessment tool. Reviewing the literature produced no rigorously validated Spanish-language food behavior assessment tools for the US Department of Agriculture’s food assistance and education programs. In response to this need, this study evaluated the face validity of a Spanish-language food behavior checklist adapted from a 16-item English version of a food behavior checklist shown to be valid and reliable for limited-resource English speakers. The English version was translated using rigorous methods involving initial translation by one party and creation of five possible versions. Photos were modified based on client input and new photos were taken as necessary. A sample of low-income, Spanish-speaking women completed cognitive interviews (n=20). Spanish translation experts (n=7) fluent in both languages and familiar with both cultures made minor modifications but essentially approved client preferences. The resulting checklist generated a readability score of 93, indicating low reading difficulty. The Spanish-language checklist has adequate face validity in the target population and is ready for further validation using convergent measures. At the conclusion of testing, this instrument may be used to evaluate nutrition education interventions in California. These qualitative procedures provide a framework for designing evaluation tools for low-literate audiences participating in the US Department of Agriculture food assistance and education programs.
Pages/Duration: 16
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/39599
DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.002
Appears in Collections:CTAHR Faculty & Researcher Works



Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.