Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Instructor interview for Place-Based WAC/WID writing instruction in Urban and Regional Planning, clip 5 of 15
PLAN 310 PD 5.mp4
Not all videos support streaming previews. You will not be able to jump to portions of the video that have not been downloaded (progress shown as a yellow bar).
In cases where streaming is not supported, the full video will be loaded before playing. If your computer is capable of playing the video files, it may be advisable to download using the link below instead of trying to view it in your browser.
|Title:||Instructor interview for Place-Based WAC/WID writing instruction in Urban and Regional Planning, clip 5 of 15|
|Authors:||Place-based WAC/WID Hui|
writing across the curriculum
writing in the disciplines
Writing Intensive courses
scholarship of teaching and learning
show 14 morewriting pedagogy
general education requirements
sense of place
kind of learning
initial course assignment
|Citation:||Das, Priyam. 'Instructor interview for Place-Based WAC/WID writing instruction in Urban and Regional Planning, clip 5 of 15.' Interview with Jim Henry and Dawne Bost. Scholarspace. Sep. 2015. Web.|
|Abstract:||Brief excerpt from interview: The place-based assignments have really worked out well, and they've been received enthusiastically by the students . . . They were also excited that they could propose something, so that helped with the creativity . . . going out in the field and actually observing was helpful to them to understand all the issues that we as urban planners look at . . . it helps them understand that there are other issues that they have to take into account, like land use, zoning, which kind of drives what goes on in the neighborhood . . . People have different skills because of their disciplinary training--there are people from the sciences and peoples from arts & humanities . . . and having everyone go out into the field and observe things, and writing about them and then discuss them puts them all on the same playing fields . . . They're all observing, maybe in different ways, but they are still going out to the same place: for example, students from architecture vs. arts vs.engineering . . . so we have some really lively discussions . . . and that helps with the oral presentations.|
|Description:||This item includes a segment of an instructor interview in a Writing Intensive course in Urban and Regional Planning at the University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa. The interview was conducted in 2014, and in this clip the interviewee is responding to the question 'What observations on course dynamics and discussions do you have?'|
|Rights:||Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States|
|Appears in Collections:||Instructor: Priyam Das|
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.