Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/35838

Global strategic patenting and innovation--policy and research implications

File SizeFormat 
iegwp002.pdf1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Global strategic patenting and innovation--policy and research implications
Authors: Ernst, Dieter
LC Subject Headings: Patents - Research
Patent infringement
Strategic planning
Issue Date: Feb 2015
Publisher: Honolulu, HI: East-West Center
Series/Report no.: East-West Center working papers. Innovation and economic growth series ; no. 2
Abstract: As an exclusionary property right, patents invite their use as a strategic weapon to shape markets and to reap monopoly rents through patent monetization. The increasing variety and global reach of strategic patenting strategies pose new and under-researched challenges for the international distribution of innovation gains. This think piece explores the proliferation of strategic patenting strategies, and highlights the growing complexity and uncertainty of the international patent system that result from the increasing use of patents as market deterrents and as a new asset class. Part One of the paper introduces four manifestations of strategic patenting that are well documented in the literature, i.e. the use of standard-essential patents (SEPs) as entry deterrents; aggressive patent infringement litigation that has galvanized the smart phone wars, with Apple as the pioneer; the proliferation of patent monetization services; and the use of cross-border patent licensing as a tool for corporate transfer pricing and tax planning. While existing research provides important insights into the drivers, we lack systematic theoretical and empirical research on how strategic patenting affects the international distribution of innovation gains. Part Two seeks to shed light on two recent forms of strategic patenting which need both theoretical and empirical case study research, i.e. the rise of Sovereign Patent Funds (SPFs), and first signs of patent-avoiding latecomer strategies, with China's Xiaomi as the most prominent example. The paper concludes with questions for policy and further research.
Description: For more about the East-West Center, see http://www.eastwestcenter.org/
Pages/Duration: 22 p.
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/35838
Appears in Collections:Innovation and Economic Growth [Working Papers]



Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.