Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/3104

Interactions between Acanthaster planci (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) and Scleractinian Corals at Kona, Hawai'i

File SizeFormat 
v51n2-121-133.pdf6.61 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Interactions between Acanthaster planci (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) and Scleractinian Corals at Kona, Hawai'i
Authors: Chess, James R.
Hobson, Edmund S.
Howard, Daniel F.
Issue Date: Apr 1997
Publisher: University of Hawaii Press
Citation: Chess JR, Hobson ES, Howard DF. 1997. Interactions between Acanthaster planci (Echinodermata, Asteroidea) and scleractinian corals at Kona, Hawai'i. Pac Sci 51(2): 121-133.
Abstract: Annual assessments of reef communities at Kona, Hawai'i, from 1985 to 1995 determined that the corallivorous sea star Acanthaster planci preferred as prey the smaller colonies of Pocillopora meandrina over the far more abundant Porites compressa and P. lobata. This finding came from three distinct settings: a Reef-Top habitat, where large (> 15 em) colonies of Pocillopora meandrina were dominant; a Reef-Face/Boulder habitat, where living scleractinians-mainly an encrusting form of Porites lobata-covered <5% of the substrate; and a CoralRich habitat, where living scleractinians-mainly Porites compressa and a massive form of P. lobata-covered >95% of the substrate. Although a corallivore, A. planci was most numerous on the reef face and adjacent boulders, where corals were fewest. There it fed mainly on colonies of P. meandrina, even though this species represented < 1% of the sparse coral coverage. Virtually all P. meandrina colonies in that habitat were < 10 em in diameter, and all seen eaten by A. planci there were <5 em. The sea star was less numerous where corals were most abundant, and there it fed on species essentially in accordance with their relative abundance in the environment. A strong inverse relationship in occurrence between the sea star and small P. meandrina colonies on the reef face and adjacent boulders indicated that this favored prey was a limited resource and that sea-star predation prevented it from becoming established in that habitat.
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/3104
ISSN: 0030-8870
Appears in Collections:Pacific Science Volume 51, Number 2, 1997



Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.