Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/2682

WRRCTMR No.70 Stream Water Quality Assessment Based on Fecal, Coliform and Fecal Streptococcus Analysis

File SizeFormat 
wrrctmr70.pdf2.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: WRRCTMR No.70 Stream Water Quality Assessment Based on Fecal, Coliform and Fecal Streptococcus Analysis
Authors: Fujioka, Roger S.
Keywords: water quality
stream pollution
sewage bacteria effluent
cesspools
storm drains
show 9 moresewage effluent
fecal coliform
fecal streptococcus
indicator bacteria
FC : FS ratio
Ahuimanu Stream
Kipapa Stream
Oahu
Hawaii

show less
LC Subject Headings: Enterobacteriaceae.
Sewage disposal in rivers, lakes, etc. –- Hawaii -- Oahu.
Streptococcus.
Water -- Pollution -- Hawaii -- Oahu.
Water quality -- Measurement -- Hawaii -- Oahu.
Issue Date: Jul 1983
Publisher: Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa
Citation: Fujioka RS. 1983. Stream water quality assessment based on fecal coliform and fecal streptococcus analysis. Honolulu (HI): Water Resources Research Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa. WRRC technical memorandum report, 70.
Series/Report no.: WRRC Technical Memorandum Report
70
Abstract: The quality of stream water in Hawaii was determined by carefully analyzing samples of unpolluted streams, streams polluted with sewage effluent, sewage effluent, cesspool wastes, and storm drain runoff for concentrations of fecal coliform (FC), fecal streptococcus (FS), and selected physical and chemical tests. High concentrations (10^3-10^4/100 ml) of FC and FS could be recovered from samples of stream waters obtained from unpolluted and polluted sites. Most of the stream-water samples collected in urbanized areas, but upstream from the sewage effluent discharge site (unpolluted stream), contained higher concentrations of FC than the 200 to 400 FC/100 ml considered by state and federal laws as being polluted with fecal matter and as a possible source of enteric pathogens. Only after analyzing stream samples for concentrations and the ratio of FC and FS, as well as concentrations of phosphates, was it possible to determine which stream samples did or did not contain sewage effluent. The results show that the impact of sewage effluent discharge into streams on Oahu, Hawaii, cannot be properly evaluated by analyzing the stream samples for only FC as mandated by law. Moreover, it should no longer be assumed that stream-water quality upstream of the sewage effluent discharge point is superior to that of the effluent entering the stream. Conclusions should not be made based solely on measurements of stream samples taken downstream of the sewage effluent discharge site. To properly assess the impact of sewage effluent discharge streams, samples of the sewage effluent - as well as stream samples taken upstream and downstream of the effluent discharge site - should be analyzed for FC, FS, phosphorus, and turbidity.
Sponsor: City and County of Honolulu, Department of Public Works Grant/Contract No. F-365-80
Pages/Duration: viii + 37 pages
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/2682
Appears in Collections:WRRC Technical Memorandum Reports



Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.