Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|EIS System 1978 - (III) Relation of State EIS System to other EIS Systems in Hawaii.pdf||869.06 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|EIS System 1978 - (V) Overall Appraisal of the EIS System.pdf||656.75 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|EIS System 1978 - Appendices.pdf||849.48 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|EIS System 1978 - (I) Introduction.pdf||1.58 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|EIS System 1978 - Table of Contents.pdf||206 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|EIS System 1978 - (II) Major Aspects of the State EIS System and Associated Issues.pdf||4.44 MB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|EIS System 1978 - (IV) The Role of the EIS System in Environmental Management.pdf||825.03 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|EIS System 1978 - (VI) Summary and Conclusions.pdf||537.38 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|EIS System 1978 - References.pdf||282.97 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||EIS System 1978 |
|Authors:||Cox, Doak C.|
Rappa, Peter J.
Miller, Jacqlelin N.
|LC Subject Headings:||Environmental impact statements.|
Environmental policy -- Hawaii.
|Publisher:||Environmental Center, University of Hawaii at Manoa|
|Citation:||Cox DC, Rappa PJ, Miller JN. 1978. EIS system 1978 - introduction. Honolulu (HI): Environmental Center, University of Hawaii.|
|Abstract:||An environmental impact statement (EIS) is a document that identifies and describes the effects that a proposed action will have on the environment. This report deals with the environmental impact statement system that was instituted in the State of Hawaii as the result of the passage of Act 246 by the 1974 Legislature. The study on which it was based was undertaken at the request of, and with the support of, the State Office of Environmental Quality Control. Act 246 (1974) and the Regulations of the Environmental Quality Commission, which was established under the Act to administer the EIS system, are incorporated in this report as Appendices A and B. Considering the purposes of the study in developing the report, we have addressed first, the background and purposes of the system; second, aspects of the system in which it differs from other similar systems or to which alternatives have been proposed; and third, modifications of the system that would result in its improvements with respect to its objectives.|
|Sponsor:||Office of Environmental Quality Control, State of Hawaii|
|Rights:||Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 United States|
|Appears in Collections:||Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) System|
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.