ScholarSpace will be brought offline for upgrades on Wednesday December 9th at 11AM HST. Service will be disrupted for approximately 2 hours. Please direct any questions to

Show simple item record

Item Description Bussmann, Rainer W. en_US Glenn, Ashley en_US Sharon, D. en_US Chait, D Díaz en_US Pourmand, K. en_US Jonat, B. en_US Somogy, S. en_US Guardado, G. en_US Aguirre, C. en_US Chan, R. en_US Meyer, K. en_US Rothrock, A. en_US Townesmith, A. en_US 2011-07-27T21:58:09Z 2011-07-27T21:58:09Z 2011 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Bussmann R W, Glenn A, Sharon D, Chait D D, Pourmand K, Jonat B, Somogy S, Guardado G, Aguirre C, Chan R, Meyer K, Rothrock A, Townesmith A. 2011. Proving that traditional knowledge works: the antibacterial activity of northern Peruvian medicinal plants. Ethnobotany Res Appl 9:067-096. en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1547-3465 en_US
dc.description research en_US
dc.description.abstract Bacterial infections and inflammation are among the ailments treated by traditional healers. The World Health Organization has expressed high interest in Traditional Medicine (TM), and it is important to demonstrate scientifically that the remedies employed in folk medicine are indeed therapeutically active. In order to evaluate the antibacterial activity of species used in traditional medicine in Northern Peru, 525 plant samples of at least 405 species were tested in simple agar-bioassays for antibacterial activity under simple laboratory conditions in a private clinic in Trujillo, Peru. Antibacterial activity was investigated against Staphylococcus aureus Rosenbach 1884, Escherichia coli (Migula 1895) Castellani & Chalmers 1919, Salmonella enterica Typhi (ex Kauffmann & Edwards 1952) Le Minor & Popoff 1987, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Schröter 1872) Migula 1900. The aim of the study was to scientifically test whether plants used in TM for the treatment of infections showed antibacterial activity, and to delineate a number of candidates for further in-depth study of their Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and toxicity. One-hundred-ninety-three ethanolic extracts and 31 water extracts were active against S. aureus. In twentyone cases only the water extract showed activity. None of the aqueous extracts were active against the other three bacteria, with the activity of the ethanolic extracts also much reduced, as only 36 showed any activity against E. coli, and 3 each against S. enterica Typhi and P. aeruginosa. Two-hundred-twenty-five extracts came from species that are traditionally employed against bacterial infections. One-hundred-sixty-six (73.8%) of these were active against at least one bacterium. Of the three-hundred extracts from plants without traditional antibacterial use, only 96 (32%) showed any activity Plants used for respiratory disorders, inflammation/infection, wounds, diarrhea, and to prevent post partum infections were efficacious in 70- 88% of the tests. Plants used for “kidney inflammation” had a much lower efficacy against bacteria and fell within the range of species that are traditionally used to treat other bodily disorders. en_US
dc.language.iso en-US en_US
dc.publisher University of Hawaii at Manoa en_US
dc.title Proving that Traditional Knowledge Works: The antibacterial activity of Northern Peruvian medicinal plants en_US
dc.type Article en_US
dc.type.dcmi Text en_US

Item File(s)

Files Size Format View
i1547-3465-09-067.pdf 643.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Advanced Search


My Account