Show simple item record



Item Description

dc.contributor.author Kletzien, Jacob en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2011-06-09T21:43:59Z en_US
dc.date.available 2011-06-09T21:43:59Z en_US
dc.date.issued 2010 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10125/20260 en_US
dc.description.abstract The current evaluation study on a university-level language program intends to determine the viability of using a specific Virtual Learning Environment in all classes at the program. The evaluation that ensued followed a mixed methods design, mixing at least one quantitative and one qualitative method in the same study (Bergman, 2008b). This paper highlights the benefits of using mixed-methods in language program evaluation as seen in the professional literature and then through a practical example of an evaluation that benefited from the use of mixed methods. Despite the great amount that has been written in favor of mixing methods in all social science research, (e.g. Bergman, 2008a; Cronbach, et al., 1980) reports of actual examples are currently in small number in the professional literature despite the calls that have been made for more of such writing especially in the context of language program evaluation (Caracelli & Greene, 1997; Cronbach et al.,1980; Weiss, 1998). The report of this evaluation, which contains the extent to which methods were mixed and the benefits of that mixing of methods for the evaluation, is presented in response to those calls for such writing. en_US
dc.format.extent 56 pages en_US
dc.subject program evaluation en_US
dc.subject mixed methods design en_US
dc.subject Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) en_US
dc.title On the Merits of Mixing Methods: A Language Program Evaluation en_US

Item File(s)

Files Size Format View
Kletzien2010SP.pdf 535.2Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

About