Show simple item record

Item Description Sinicrope, Castle en_US 2011-06-09T21:41:12Z en_US 2011-06-09T21:41:12Z en_US 2007 en_US
dc.identifier.uri en_US
dc.description.abstract Inspired by contradictory findings and an overwhelming focus on comparing cohesive devices with the quality of writing in previous research, this study seeks to provide a descriptive, more nuanced picture of cohesion in successful L2 writing. Additionally, it investigates to what extent the use of cohesive devices varies across successful L2 writers and across different writing tasks. Writing samples were collected from different genres such as explanatory writing, text analysis, library research paper, and were analyzed following Halliday and Hasan’s (1796) taxonomy for cohesive devices. The results revealed that successful L2 writers employed more cohesive devices as well as the many subtypes of cohesion. In addition, in general, reference and conjunctive cohesion use was uniform across writers. Lexical cohesion use, on the other hand, differed more drastically between writers, suggesting that cohesion may differ more across text types than across individual writers. Finally, although successful L2 writers tend to use more cohesive devices, the presence of such devices does not guarantee a comprehensible and coherent text, so cautious interpretation on the results should be made. en_US
dc.format.extent 27 pages en_US
dc.subject cohesive devices en_US
dc.subject academic writing en_US
dc.subject cohesion en_US
dc.subject L2 writing en_US
dc.title Revisiting Cohesive Devices in Academic L2 English Writing: What Do Successful Writers Use? en_US

Item File(s)

Files Size Format View
Sinicrope2007.pdf 338.8Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record


Advanced Search


My Account