Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/20189

The Impact of Different Modes of Collaborative Interactions among Peers: Peer Review and Revisions in Electronic vs. Traditional Modes on L2 Writing

File SizeFormat 
Kim2007.pdf369.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: The Impact of Different Modes of Collaborative Interactions among Peers: Peer Review and Revisions in Electronic vs. Traditional Modes on L2 Writing
Authors: Kim, Yun-Seon
Keywords: online class
interaction
L2 writing
modality
revision
Issue Date: 2007
Abstract: This study investigates the differences between two writing classes which have the same textbooks, content, and course objectives of academic literacy achievement but have different modes of instruction: technology-enhanced versus traditional. It examined how peer feedback differs in these two contexts and how those differences affect students’ revisions. The data was collected from multiple sources: oral interaction in peer review sessions, written responses, and student and teacher interviews and a classroom observation. The results evidenced that the modes of communication in the form of peer feedback did not have any obstacles for the L2 writings in the on-line class.
Pages/Duration: 38 pages
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/20189
Appears in Collections:Student Work - ELI



Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.