Item Description

Show full item record

Title: Should We Hate or Love MIRAB? 
Author: Poirine, Bernard
Date: 1998
Publisher: University of Hawai'i Press
Center for Pacific Islands Studies
Citation: Poirine, B. 1998. Should We Hate or Love MIRAB? The Contemporary Pacific 10 (1): 65-105.
Abstract: Bertram and Watters defined the mirab model (Migration, Remittances, Aid,
and Bureaucracy) as a development process where remittances and foreign aid
are the main resources of small island economies. Bertram suggested that it is a
perfectly “sustainable” development strategy, as long as the “rent” from remittances
and international aid continues. But there is a great reluctance on the part
of officials and economists to accept the model as valid and sustainable. To them,
it does not seem right to live off international aid and migrant remittances. A
favorable case can be made for mirab. Pacific Island peoples and governments
should not feel guilty about accepting aid and remittances, because such “external
resources” may be seen as representing revenues from invisible exports to
industrialized countries. By exporting labor and geostrategic services, small
Pacific Island states make the best use of the only comparative advantage they
may have in international trade. Donor countries and migrant host countries also
gain from this arrangement. In this paper, I look at reasons why some people
hate mirab, then show why everyone should love mirab.
ISSN: 1043-898X
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/13198
Keywords: aid, migration, remittances, small island states, sustainable development
LC Subject Headings: Oceania -- Periodicals.

Item File(s)

Files Size Format View
v10n1-65-105.pdf 343.4Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Search


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

About