Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/101632

Habitat use and trophic ecology of the introduced snapper lutjanus kasmira and native goatfishes in Hawaii

File Description SizeFormat 
Schumacher_Brett_r.pdfVersion for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted6.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Schumacher_Brett_uh.pdfVersion for UH users6.89 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Habitat use and trophic ecology of the introduced snapper lutjanus kasmira and native goatfishes in Hawaii
Authors: Schumacher, Brett D.
Keywords: snappers
Issue Date: Aug 2011
Publisher: [Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [August 2011]
Abstract: There have been persistent concerns among the fishing community in Hawaii that the introduced snapper Lutjanus kasmira has caused declines in populations of native shallow-water fishery species. L. kasmira has purportedly caused these declines through predation on juveniles and/or competition with adults for food or shelter. Because goatfishes were commonly cited as having been adversely affected by the introduced snapper, the present investigation compared habitat use and trophic ecology of L. kasmira and three native species of goatfish (Mulloidichthys flavolineatus, M. vanicolensis and Parupeneus multifasciatus). Studies of small-scale habitat use indicated that L. kasmira can displace resting schools of M. vanicolensis farther from shelter. However, clear detrimental effects of this displacement have not been quantified, and any such effects would likely be limited to locations where these species co-occur at high densities. Acoustic telemetry and research fishing found that larger-scale habitat use patterns of L. kasmira and goatfishes would be unlikely to drive competition for food. Areas used by Mulloidichthys spp. for nocturnal feeding were generally deeper sandy habitats, while those used by L. kasmira were shallower and closer to the reef. P. multifasciatus always stayed relatively close to the reef but fed during the day. Fish were collected for dietary analysis off the south shore and Kaneohe Bay of Oahu, and off the west shore of the Island of Hawaii. Archived diet data from the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands and Puako Bay on the Island of Hawaii were also incorporated into dietary analyses. Although there was some similarity in types of prey consumed by L. kasmira and P. multifasciatus, there was no evidence that abundance of L. kasmira affected the diet or biological condition of P. multifasciatus or any other species in the study. Additionally, no fish (e.g. P. porphyreus, Zebrasoma flavescens) or invertebrate (Ranina ranina, Octopus cyanea) species that were important to local fisheries were identified in L. kasmira guts. Given the lack of evidence of strong ecological interactions between L. kasmira and other species in this study, fears that the introduced snapper has had a detrimental impact on commercially important native species in Hawaii appear to be unfounded.
Description: Ph.D. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2011.
Includes bibliographical references.
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/101632
Appears in Collections:Ph.D. - Zoology



Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.