The effects of expertise, agreement, and situational context on perceptions of bias in authorities
The effects of expertise, agreement, and situational context on perceptions of bias in authorities
Date
2011-08
Authors
Salmon, Michael Patrick
Contributor
Advisor
Department
Instructor
Depositor
Speaker
Researcher
Consultant
Interviewer
Annotator
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
[Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [August 2011]
Volume
Number/Issue
Starting Page
Ending Page
Alternative Title
Abstract
The current study explored how individuals perceive bias in various authorities making arguments for one side of a controversial topic (in this case, anthropogenic global warming [AGW]). Recent theorizing on the nature of belief suggests that unavoidable time and energy constraints demand that individuals resolve their predicaments economically by relying upon authorities to provide useful information on topics of interest (Hardin, 2009). Emotional indicators of belief may to facilitate the decision-making process by highlighting the plausibility of information in light of past experiences (Leicester, 2008).
The present study explored perceptions of bias in authorities based upon three factors: a.) credentials of the presenting authority, b.) a prime casting climate change as either a scientific or moral issue, and c.) agreement of the authority's argument with participants' prior climate change beliefs.
Analysis revealed a significant interaction between argument agreement and authority, suggesting that individuals selectively consider an authority's credentials when perceiving bias, depending on the authority's agreement with one's prior beliefs. Participants were unable to recall many, if any, resources by which they had learned about AGW. As well, higher levels of belief certainty and moral engagement in AGW were associated with more lenient treatment of agreeing authorities and harsher treatment of disagreeing authorities. These findings suggest that individuals may dismiss inconvenient scientific opinions when a more agreeable argument is presented, even when such an argument is presented by one with few valid credentials.
Description
M.A. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2011.
Includes bibliographical references.
Includes bibliographical references.
Keywords
authorities
Citation
Extent
Format
Geographic Location
Time Period
Related To
Theses for the degree of Master of Arts (University of Hawaii at Manoa). Psychology.
Table of Contents
Rights
Rights Holder
Local Contexts
Collections
Email libraryada-l@lists.hawaii.edu if you need this content in ADA-compliant format.