Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Personality types and criminal interrogations : examining interrogation strategies and false admissions
|Warner_Mark_r.pdf||Version for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted||422.86 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Warner_Mark_uh.pdf||Version for UH users||430.35 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
|Title:||Personality types and criminal interrogations : examining interrogation strategies and false admissions|
|Authors:||Warner, Mark Stephen|
|Issue Date:||Aug 2014|
|Publisher:||[Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [August 2014]|
|Abstract:||This study investigated the relationship between interrogation strategies, personality types and the likelihood that a false confession might occur. The usage of minimization and maximization tactics in interrogations by investigators was explained; as was how investigators might choose one interrogation tactic over another based on a suspect's dominant personality type. Specifically, introversion and extraversion were considered most relevant. The study utilized 103 subjects reading a hypothetical interrogation scenario involving a make-up exam and rated the likelihood that they would confess to the accusation of sharing answers with a classmate. Results showed that minimization strategies led to a significant higher likelihood that participants would falsely admit to sharing answers than would maximization strategies. Implications and limitations of the results are discussed.|
|Description:||M.A. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2014.|
Includes bibliographical references.
|Rights:||All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.|
|Appears in Collections:||M.A. - Communicology|
Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.