Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/100368

Preliminary investigation of the efficacy of clinically practical dual-task tests as a concussion assessment tool : a comparison of single-and dual-task tests on healthy young adults

File Description SizeFormat 
Shimizu_Ayaka_r.pdfVersion for non-UH users. Copying/Printing is not permitted367.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Shimizu_Ayaka_uh.pdfVersion for UH users370.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Item Summary

Title: Preliminary investigation of the efficacy of clinically practical dual-task tests as a concussion assessment tool : a comparison of single-and dual-task tests on healthy young adults
Authors: Shimizu, Ayaka
Keywords: Modified Balance Error Scoring System
Issue Date: Aug 2014
Publisher: [Honolulu] : [University of Hawaii at Manoa], [August 2014]
Abstract: Objective: To develop Dual-Task tests using clinically practical physical and cognitive tasks. The effect of Dual-Task tests was investigated by comparing the outcome measures to that of Single-Task tests on healthy subjects.
Method: 54 healthy participants were recruited. Testing involved Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS) and three cognitive tasks [Backward Digit Recall (BDR), Serial Sevens (SS), and Auditory Pure Switch Task (APST)]. Repeated Measure Analysis of Variance, paired t-tests, Intraclass Correlation Coefficients were performed on SPSS v22.0 with an alpha level of p<0.05 Results: Total mBESS score increased under Dual-Task combination with SS compared to its Single-Task score (p=0.01). Accuracy for BDR, Digit Span for SS and APST showed significant decrease under Dual-Task task with single-leg stance on foam (p<0.05).
Conclusions: These Dual-Task combinations had similar effects as shown in previous research and may show promise as part of developing a practical, clinically based Dual-Task test for assessing concussion.
Description: M.S. University of Hawaii at Manoa 2014.
Includes bibliographical references.
URI/DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/100368
Rights: All UHM dissertations and theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission from the copyright owner.
Appears in Collections:M.S. - Kinesiology and Rehabilitation Science



Items in ScholarSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.